Synthesis: combining results systematically and appropriately
By James Thomas, A. Harden, M. Newman. 2012
152 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f765817cf653a24f8a47cb45258e6b369a231fc
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Neal R Haddaway
- Andrew Pullin
- Birte Snilstveit
- T. Knight
- M. Avgousti
- Martina Vojtkova
- M. Bangpan
- Sandy Oliver
Citations in the corpus
- Intercultural communicative competence and online exchanges: a systematic review (2018, background): “Furthermore, a greater number of OIEs could be conducted in primary, secondary, and even kindergarten contexts, and future research could even focus on the development of learners’ ICC in informal contexts, or as Thorne (2010) would have called it, ‘in the wild’ (p.”
- Human well-being impacts of terrestrial protected areas (2012, methodology): “The five neat stages of framework analysis described for primary research [18] are in practice a more iterative process for making sense of a pile of studies [19].”
- Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice (2012, background): “But just as primary research can be applied to answer a range of different questions, the logic of systematic reviews can also be applied to syntheses of evidence addressing a range of different questions (Gough et al. 2012).”