Context and connectivity in plant metapopulations and landscape mosaics: does the matrix matter?

By H. Murphy, J. Lovett-Doust. 2004

234 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f704f448ddd67a1e25551eeae2000097d4e1204

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Does the type of matrix matter? A quantitative review of the evidence (2010, background): “Despite this recognized importance, there were only qualitative reviews on the subject focused on particular taxonomic groups (Jules and Shahani 2003; Rodewald 2003; Haynes and Cronin 2004; Murphy and Lovett-Doust 2004).”
THE MATRIX ENHANCES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CORRIDORS AND STEPPING STONES (2004, background): “…promoting movement between patches when contiguous habitat can not be obtained or when stepping stones are more representative of the natural configuration of the landscape (Gilpin 1980, Simberloff et al. 1992, Schultz 1998, Haddad 2000, Fischer and Lindenmayer 2002, Murphy and Lovett-Doust 2004).”
Can agroforest woodlots work as stepping stones for birds in the Atlantic forest region? (2008, background): “…Kupfer et al. 2006; Lindenmayer et al. 2006), inXuencing edge eVects (Didham and Lawton 1999; Mesquita et al. 1999), regulating disturbance spread (Murphy and Lovett-Doust 2004), serving as secondary habitat (Laurance et al. 2002; Pardini 2004; Antongiovanni and Metzger 2005), and mainly…”
Integrating species distribution models and interacting particle systems to predict the spread of an invasive alien plant (2010, background): “In particular, the binary distinction between suitable habitat and unsuitable matrix does not seem to be appropriate for many of them (Murphy & Lovett-Doust, 2004).”
Small mammals in a mosaic of forest remnants and anthropogenic habitats—evaluating matrix quality in an Atlantic forest landscape (2007, background): “... several authors have pointed out that landscape connectivity, defined as the amount of flow of organisms or genes in a landscape (Urban and Shugart 1986), depends not only on the distance among remnants, but also on the presence of corridors and stepping stones and on the permeability of the dif”
Which plant traits predict species loss in calcareous grasslands with extinction debt? (2012, background): “However, if the isolation of suitable habitat patches increases beyond the dispersal distance, longdistance dispersers may be more disadvantaged than poor dispersers, as more of their seeds end up in an inhospitable environment (Murphy & Lovett-Doust, 2004; Ouborg et al., 2006).”
Edge effects on flower-visiting insects in grapefruit plantations bordering premontane subtropical forest. (2005, background): “More recently, Murphy & Lovett-Doust (2004) reported that the matrix may strongly affect between-patch processes by (1) reducing or enhancing dispersal and colonization rates; (2) providing alternative, suboptimal habitat; and (3) acting as a source of novel invading species.”
Relative importance of resource quantity, isolation and habitat quality for landscape distribution of a monophagous butterfly (2005, background): “Effects of habitat isolation depend on 1) the dispersal ability of a species, 2) the distance to the nearest colonized habitat, and 3) the landscape matrix between habitats including barriers, corridors and stepping stones (Murphy and Lovett-Doust 2004, Tscharntke and Brandl 2004).”
Plant functional group composition and large-scale species richness in European agricultural landscapes (2008, background): “…conclusion is not consistent with general knowledge as shown for animals (McCoy & Mushinsky 1994; Bender et al. 1998; Fahrig 2003; Schooley & Wiens 2005), that has already been challenged by plant ecologists (Harrison & Bruna 1999; Dauber et al. 2003; Murphy & Lovett-Doust 2004; Soons et al. 2005).”
Targeting and evaluating biodiversity conservation action within fragmented landscapes: an approach based on generic focal species and least-cost networks (2010, background): “importance of the matrix to species movement and population persistence has long been recognised (Ricketts 2001; Murphy and Lovett-Doust 2004; Debinski 2006), but incorporating the matrix into real-world landscape planning has proved elusive (Opdam et al.”
Ecological and Evolutionary Consequences of Biological Invasion and Habitat Fragmentation (2005, background): “Although classical metapopulation ecology treats the matrix as uninhabitable (Wiens 1997), recent investigations have shown that some effects of habitat fragmentation on species persistence depend greatly on the complexity of the surrounding landscape (Cook and others 2004; Murphy and Lovett-Doust 2”
Spillover of functionally important organisms between managed and natural habitats (2012, background): “Similar to pollinators subsidized by agricultural crops, seed dispersers may profit from landscape matrix quality (Murphy and Lovett-Doust, 2004).”
The role of remnant trees in seed dispersal through the matrix: Being alone is not always so sad (2009, background): “More importantly, our comparative results on seed dispersal under remnant and patch trees highlight the importance of considering the role played by structural features of the degraded matrix in buffering the negative effects of habitat fragmentation ( Murphy and Lovett-Doust, 2004; Bender and Fahr”
Bryophytes in a changing landscape: The hierarchical effects of habitat fragmentation on ecological and evolutionary processes (2007, background): “Recent reviews have highlighted the importance of considering species interactions for mammals and vascular plants in order to understand the causal mechanisms which control species richness in habitat fragments (Fox and Fox, 2000; Murphy and Lovett-Doust, 2004).”
PUTTING A CART BEFORE THE SEARCH: SUCCESSFUL HABITAT PREDICTION FOR A RARE FOREST HERB (2005, methodology): “In cases where a species does not conform as readily to suitable/unsuitable habitat delineations, predictive habitat gradient models, as advocated by Murphy and Lovett-Doust (2004), can still be undertaken using CART modeling in combination with grid-based GIS data layers.”