Components of tree resilience: effects of successive low‐growth episodes in old ponderosa pine forests

By F. Lloret, E. Keeling, Anna Sala. 2011

879 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f5ff2eabbd68d583919095802385c7d678885de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Atmospheric Science

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Resist, recover or both? Growth plasticity in response to drought is geographically structured and linked to intraspecific variability in Pinus pinaster (2018, methodology): “To quantify the response of tree growth to drought, we calculated the indices proposed by Lloret et al. (2011): resistance (Rt), recovery (Rc), resilience (Rs) and relative resilience (rRs = Rs–Rt).”
A review of measuring ecosystem resilience to disturbance (2021, methodology): “To correct the problem, Lloret et al (2011) proposed a relative resilience index as, Relative Resilience= Vpost −Vdist Vpre = Vpost Vpre − Vdist Vpre = Resilience−Resistance.”
Contrasting vulnerability and resilience to drought-induced decline of densely planted vs. natural rear-edge Pinus nigra forests (2013, methodology): “In order to characterize different aspects of resilience to drought we calculated four resilience indices following Lloret et al. (2011) (BAI resistance, BAIRt; BAI recovery, BAIRc; BAI resilience, BAIRs; and relative BAI resilience, BAIRRs).”
Effects of stand composition and tree size on resistance and resilience to drought in sessile oak and Scots pine (2015, methodology): “Moreover, we could imagine that oaks could respond differently to droughts as 565 they grow older (as suggested by Lloret et al. (2011) and Martínez-Vilalta et al. (2012) for pine 566 species) leading to a potential change in the direction of the individual tree response to 567 different drought…”
Impact of climate and drought events on the growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) provenances (2013, methodology): “We analyzed individual tree tolerance to drought conditions using indices for resistance, recovery, resilience and relative resilience following Lloret et al. (2011). In contrast to their study we identified specific drought years for each site (BH: 2003, WSD: 2006) based on the respective moisture ”
Mixture reduces climate sensitivity of Douglas-fir stem growth (2016, background): “Lloret et al. (2011) described the resilience as the ratio of post-disturbance growth level to pre-disturbance growth level.”
Tree vitality indicators revealed a rapid response of beech forests to the 2018 drought (2021, background): “one third of the trees affected or severely affected in 2018 resulted affected or severely affected also in 2019, the majority of trees and plots with SCT and SLB recovered in 2019, indicating a generally high resilience (Lloret et al., 2011), i.”
The greater resilience of mixed forests to drought mainly depends on their composition: Analysis along a climate gradient across Europe (2021, background): “Higher relative resilience can be interpreted in two ways, as it can reflect either higher buffer capacity to recover or compensating positive effects of the impact via increased neighbour mortality and resource availability to surviving trees (Lloret et al. 2011).”