A global solution for the Mars static and seasonal gravity, Mars orientation, Phobos and Deimos masses, and Mars ephemeris

By A. Konopliv, C. F. Yoder, E. Standish, D. Yuan, W. Sjogren. 2006

311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f4943167b75d4194113de8fd29a135ea9e3ae98

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

Citations in the corpus

Mars high resolution gravity fields from MRO, Mars seasonal gravity, and other dynamical parameters (2011, methodology): “…Mars global circulation models (GCM) and Odyssey neutron data (Smith et al., 1999b; Karatekin et al., 2005; Sanchez et al., 2006), and measured with MGS and Mars Odyssey tracking data (Smith et al., 2001a, 2009; Yoder et al., 2003; Balmino et al., 2005; Konopliv et al., 2006; Marty et al., 2009).”
HED Meteorites and Their Relationship to the Geology of Vesta and the Dawn Mission (2011, methodology): “The bulk density used in the calculation of Ruzicka et al. (1997) was ~3.54 g/cm3, lower than the ~3.76 g/cm3 value calculated from the most recent Vesta mass determination (Konopliv et al. 2006) and HST diameter measurements (Thomas et al. 1997).”
Gravity and Topography of the Terrestrial Planets (2015, methodology): “The most recent gravity model ofKonopliv et al.(1999) has considerably improved the spacecraft navigational errors, and these improved orbit predictions have been used by Rappaport et al. (1999) in a complete reprocessing of the altimetry data set (archived as GTDR3.”
Report of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements: 2009 (2011, methodology): “4. The new pole and rotation models of Konopliv, et al. 2006 for Mars and Giampieri, et al. 2006 for Saturn are noted in the text, but not recommended for general use at this time.”
INPOP08, a 4-D planetary ephemeris: from asteroid and time-scale computations to ESA Mars Express and Venus Express contributions (2009, methodology): “We have also fitted the AU and comparisons are provided with the latest determinations of DE414 (Standish 2006; Konopliv et al. 2006) and DE421 (Folkner 2008).”
INPOP06: a new numerical planetary ephemeris (2008, methodology): “The fit of INPOP06 was done using observations until June 2005 while the JPL DE414 numerical solution (Konopliv et al. 2006) is fitted to the most recent MGS and Mars Odyssey observations until April 2005.”
The Planetary and Lunar Ephemeris DE 421 (2009, unknown): “[9] A.”
Phenomenology of the Lense-Thirring effect in the solar system (2010, methodology): “5.1 The use of one nearly polar spacecraft Let us start with a polar orbital geometry and examine the systematic error δµ induced by the uncertainty 28 in the even zonals δJℓ on the node Ω by assuming for them the calibrated covariance sigmas of the latest Mars gravity model MGS95J (Konopliv et al. ”
The IAU 2009 system of astronomical constants: the report of the IAU working group on numerical standards for Fundamental Astronomy (2011, background): “Astronomical unit, au The current best estimate for the astronomical unit, au, has been taken from Pitjeva and Standish (2009) and is an average of recent estimates for the au defined by k.”
Density of asteroids (2012, background): “An accuracy of few percent can be reached for the most massive asteroids such as (1) Ceres, (2) Pallas, or (4) Vesta ( e.g. , Konopliv et al., 2006; Zielenbach, 2011).”