Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique.

By F. Hasson, S. Keeney, H. McKenna. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2000

5,700 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f43a7e5e05f5fee3bdcf2c1c0aa6beb7cb94cca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. Keeney
2. F. Hasson
3. C. Powell
4. N. Robinson
5. Esmé G Trevelyan
6. R. Plummer
7. Yao-Fen Wang
8. D. Armitage

Citations in the corpus

• Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research (2011, background): “It is assumed the Delphi contributes to concurrent validity, [53,76,78,79] due to the successive rounds [87] as the panellists have identified and agreed the components [53].”
• A Consensus Approach Toward the Standardization of Back Pain Definitions for Use in Prevalence Studies (2008, methodology): “This exercise led to the conclusion that 7 different elements could be distinguished: (1) the time frame of the measure, (2) the site of low back pain, (3) the symptoms observed, (4) the duration of symptoms, (5) the frequency of symptoms, (6) the severity of low back pain, and (7) exclusions.”
• Measuring health literacy in populations: illuminating the design and development process of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q) (2013, methodology): “Health promotion Ability to update oneself on determinants of health in the social and physical environment Ability to understa information on det of health in the so physical environme derive meaning to transform opinion into group consensus [24], was applied to generate items to measure each of th”
• Phase 2 of CATALISE: a multinational and multidisciplinary Delphi consensus study of problems with language development: Terminology (2017, neutral): “There is no agreed criterion for when a Delphi consensus is deemed adequate for an item – in the literature, values from 51% to 80% agreement have been used (Hasson et al., 2000).”
• Definition of treatment goals for moderate to severe psoriasis: a European consensus (2010, background): “To accomplish this structured communication there should be: some feedback of individual contributions of information and knowledge; assessment of the group’s judgment or view; opportunities for individuals to revise views; a certain degree of anonymity for the individual responses and repetition [1”
• The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research (2011, methodology): “tion concerning the collective judgements of respondents (Hasson et al., 2000).”
• Constructing career competency model of hospitality industry employees for career success. (2013, methodology): “The appropriateness of the Delphi method has been detailed by numerous researchers (Hasson et al., 2000; Okoli and Pawlowski, 2004).”
• The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content (2010, background): “Rather experts are chosen because of their knowledge of the topic of interest [32,33].”
• Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies (2011, methodology): “Each of the items included in the table had been highlighted, by one or more of the commentaries mentioned earlier [13–15], as an important methodological consideration when using the Delphi technique.”
• Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic review (2017, methodology): “its conduct; and the quality and transparency of reporting.(22) Biondo et al.”
• Physical Frailty: ICFSR International Clinical Practice Guidelines for Identification and Management (2019, neutral): “Further iterations of the recommendations and manuscript were then made via email using an iterative Delphi process of expert consensus (55).”
• A systematic review of the smart home literature: A user perspective (2019, background): “The expertise of the reviewers on the topic facilitated and enhanced the potential of the study to identify novel themes and extend the insights into the topic [31].”