A Comparison of Survey Methods for Detecting Bobcats

By R. L. Harrison. 2006

106 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f41ac913cf4872cd186cc659b3074af9f85bfa4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

1. P. Mackay
2. J. Buzas
3. M. McCarthy
4. W. Zielinski
5. R. Long
6. R. Tingley
7. T. Donovan
8. W. Kristan

In Ecology

1. T. Donovan
2. P. Mackay
3. R. Long
4. J. Buzas
5. W. Zielinski
6. Anthony R. Rooyen
7. M. McCarthy
8. A. Weeks

Citations in the corpus

• Assessing the cost‐efficiency of environmental DNA sampling (2016, background): “Although optimal survey design protocols have been established for many traditional survey methods (Harrison 2006; Lyra-Jorge et al. 2008; Sanderlin, Block & Ganey 2014; Shannon, Lewis &Gerber 2014), most previous analyses have failed to account for temporal variation in detection probabilities…”
• Effectiveness of Scat Detection Dogs for Detecting Forest Carnivores (2007, background): “Because scat detection dogs are a relatively new wildlife survey technique, their effectiveness has been quantified for very few target species (Smith et al. 2001, 2003, 2005; Wasser et al. 2004; Harrison 2006).”
• Comparing Scat Detection Dogs, Cameras, and Hair Snares for Surveying Carnivores (2007, methodology): “Despite growing interest in this method, few studies (Smith et al. 2001, 2003, 2005; Wasser et al. 2004; Harrison 2006) have quantitatively explored its effectiveness.”