The importance of biotic interactions for modelling species distributions under climate change

By Miguel B. Araújo, Miska Luoto. 2007

1,242 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f1d0dd107637d25bfbb0c35f93fe83dee6b7af1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Understanding co‐occurrence by modelling species simultaneously with a Joint Species Distribution Model (JSDM) (2014, background): “Most current approaches to incorporating biotic interactions in SDMs involve adding the occurrence or abundance of other species as predictors (Araujo & Luoto 2007; Heikkinen et al. 2007;Meier et al. 2010).”
Evaluating the combined threat of climate change and biological invasions on endangered species. (2013, background): “Although explicitly including water chemistry and biotic interaction in SDMs would certainly increase the predictive capacity of models, climate is considered the key limiting factor governing species distribution at a macroecological scale, thus models calibrated with present day climate are expect”
Climate Change Threatens Giant Panda Protection in the 21st Century (2015, background): “However, some researchers have suggested that these biotic interactions may be critical to improve the predictive power of SDMs (Miska and Araújo, 2007; Preston et al., 2008; Boulangeat et al., 2012), especially those across trophic levels (Vander Putten et al.”
New trends in species distribution modelling (2010, background): “species ranges (Araújo and Luoto 2007), or of the effect of”
Pushing the limits in marine species distribution modelling: lessons from the land present challenges and opportunities (2011, background): “While many of these interactions are likely to influence the performance of SDMs, competition is commonly noted as an issue for terrestrial SDMs (Guisan & Thuiller, 2005; Araújo & Luoto, 2007; Heikkinen et al., 2007).”
Spatial interpolation of monthly climate data for Finland: comparing the performance of kriging and generalized additive models (2013, background): “Many biotic and abiotic processes are determined by climatic conditions and require long-term climatic datasets for research (Fronzek et al. 2006; Araújo and Luoto 2007; Kullmann 2010).”
Habitat shifts of endangered species under altered climate conditions: importance of biotic interactions (2008, background): “Thus, incorporating biotic relationships into species’ models will lead to more realistic estimates of the impacts of climate change on suitable habitat (Leathwick et al., 1996; Araújo & Luoto, 2007).”
Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels (2010, background): “Some studies in terrestrial systems have already shown successfully that including biotic interactions across trophic levels improves the outcomes of climate models, even at macro-ecological scales (Araujo & Luoto 2007).”
Climate change in Europe. 1. Impact on terrestrial ecosystems and biodiversity. A review (2009, background): “Likewise, the current distribution of the clouded Apollo (Parnassius mnemosyne) is explained not only by climate suitability, but also by the presence of its Corydalis host plant (Araújo and Luoto, 2007).”
Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: variable selection and scale (2011, background): “However, see Araújo & Luoto (2007) for a statement in which they call for more stringent evidence in support of the idea that purely climate-based modelling is sufficient to quantify the impact of climate change on species distributions.”
Increasing range mismatching of interacting species under global change is related to their ecological characteristics (2012, background): “Thirdly, the importance of biotic interactions in assessing future species performance and distribution has become apparent (Araújo & Luoto, 2007; Heikkinen et al., 2007; Preston et al., 2008; Schweiger et al., 2010).”
Travelling through a warming world: climate change and migratory species. (2009, background): “…shifts in breeding grounds and 95 Endang Species Res 7: 87–99, 2009 non-breeding areas, but as migratory species move between different areas, the uncertainties in predictions are multiplied, particularly when biotic interactions are taken into account (Araújo & Luoto 2007, Martin et al. 2007).”
A case for incorporating phylogeography and landscape genetics into species distribution modelling approaches to improve climate adaptation and conservation planning (2010, methodology): “…questioned the relative importance of climate in relation to species demography (Mustin et al., 2007; Davis et al., 1998; Pearson & Dawson, 2003; Araujo & Luoto, 2007) and have highlighted the critical importance of incorporating life history attributes into modelling approaches to produce more…”