Induced systemic resistance by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria
By Corne M.J. PIETERSE1, J. A. V. PELT1, Bas W.M. VERHAGEN1, Jurriaan TON1, Saskia C.M. Van WEES1, Karen M. LEON-KLOOSTERZIEL1, L. C. V. LOON1. 2003
159 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ef4ea0bfb3488b5e6371ca1c72352a36d417182
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
Citations in the corpus
- Induced systemic resistance in cucumber and Arabidopsis thaliana by the combination of Trichoderma harzianum Tr6 and Pseudomonas sp. Ps14 (2013, background): “is SA-independent and JA and ET signaling dependent (Bakker et al., 2007; Pieterse et al., 2003; Van Loon et al., 1998).”
- The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms (2009, background): “In addition, ISR can be effective under field conditions and in commercial greenhouses (Zehnder et al. 2001; Pieterse et al. 2003).”
- The effect of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on the growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cropped in southern Brazilian fields (2012, background): “Indirect stimulation occurs when PGPR prevent the deleterious effects of phytopathogenic microorganisms by producing siderophores, β-1,3-glucanase, chitinases and antibiotics (Glick 1995; Glick and Pasternak 2003) or by inducing systemic disease resistance (Tuzun and Kloepper 1994).”
- Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: A Critical Review (2011, background): “ISR is a plant-mediated mechanism it resembles classic pathogen-induced resistance, in which non-infected parts of previously pathogen-infected plants become more resistant to further infection [14].”