Repairing the Harm: Victims and Restorative Justice

By H. Strang, Lawrence W. Sherman. Utah law review, 2003

155 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ea2e2b9bad08ed8766ffac40f00913bfffa7e14

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Jo-Anne Wemmers
2. Tinneke Van Camp

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Jo-Anne Wemmers
2. Tinneke Van Camp
3. Lawrence W. Sherman
4. Daniel J. Woods
5. Barak Ariel
6. Richard A. Berk
7. Matthew Bland
8. A. Payne

Citations in the corpus

• Victim satisfaction with restorative justice (2013, background): “As noted by Van den Bos (1996; Lind and Van den Bos, 2002) in relation to fairness assessment in general, but also by Shapland et al. (2007) and Strang and Sherman (2003) in relation to the assessment of restorative justice in particular, such cognitive and informational preparation is instrumental…”
• Victim Evaluations of Face-to-Face Restorative Justice Conferences: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis (2006, background): “The answer to that question is clearly yes, for at least one kind of RJ. Evidence from three countries now shows that victims can derive substantial benefits from a form of face-to-face RJ (McGarrell et al., 2000; Sherman et al., 2006; Strang, 2002; Strang & Sherman, 2003).”