Victim Evaluations of Face-to-Face Restorative Justice Conferences: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis

By H. Strang, Lawrence W. Sherman, C. Angel, Daniel J. Woods, Stephanie Bennett, D. Newbury-Birch, Nova Inkpen. 2006

224 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46a06f4e428585127b71dbaf6bcc777b89f45f10

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Lawrence W. Sherman
2. Jo-Anne Wemmers
3. Tinneke Van Camp
4. Barak Ariel
5. Kelly Welch
6. A. Payne

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Barak Ariel
2. Jo-Anne Wemmers
3. Lawrence W. Sherman
4. Tinneke Van Camp
5. Daniel J. Woods
6. Richard A. Berk
7. P. Neyroud
8. Eleanor Neyroud

Citations in the corpus

• Victim satisfaction with restorative justice (2013, background): “In doing so, they changed the course of social justice studies (Lind and Tyler, 1988). They found that variations in procedure independently affect perceptions of fairness. This implies that perceived fairness is not only related to satisfaction with the outcome, but also to how the outcome is reach”
• Restorative Justice Conferencing (RJC) Using Face‐to‐Face Meetings of Offenders and Victims: Effects on Offender Recidivism and Victim Satisfaction. A Systematic Review (2013, background): “and Inkpen, N. (2005). ‘The effects of restorative justice conferences on Crown Court sentencing of confessed robbers and burglars: a report to the Esmee Fairbairn Foundation.”