Hash-based enhancement of location privacy for radio-frequency identification devices using varying identifiers

By Dirk Henrici, Paul Müller. IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, 2004. Proceedings of the Second, 2004

558 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A scalable and provably secure hash-based RFID protocol (2005, background): “Privacy can be enforcred in RFID systems by “repressive” techniques (physical destruction, blocker tag [8], etc.) or “preventive” techniques (e.g. [5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13]).”
RFID security and privacy: a research survey (2006, background): “• Henrici and Müller [31] propose to resolve the synchronization problem by having a tag emit the number of timesteps since the last successful authentication with the reader.”
Authenticating Pervasive Devices with Human Protocols (2005, background): “Rather than sharing a single k-bit random secret x, the tag and reader now share an additional k-bit random secret y. Unlike the case in the HB protocol, the tag in the HB+ protocol first generates random k-bit “blinding” vector b and sends it to the reader.”
SASI: A New Ultralightweight RFID Authentication Protocol Providing Strong Authentication and Strong Integrity (2007, background): “Ç”
A Lightweight RFID Protocol to protect against Traceability and Cloning attacks (2005, background): “This last step is vital as it acts as a message authentication code (recall the notation hK(M)) preventing cloning attacks by an adversary1.”
EMAP: An Efficient Mutual-Authentication Protocol for Low-Cost RFID Tags (2006, methodology): “Protocol HLS [14] EHLS [14] HBVI [ 4 ] MAP [15] EMAP”