The next step: Integrating actuarial risk assessment and clinical judgment into an evidence-based practice framework in CPS case management

By A. Shlonsky, D. Wagner. 2005

256 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e84768c64f84d4c8f514d99c3c986668a1feb77

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Vicki R. LeBlanc
2. M. Bogo
3. C. Regehr
4. Bob Lonne
5. A. Shlonsky
6. Eric U. Russ
7. Y. Darlington

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Bogo
2. Vicki R. LeBlanc
3. C. Regehr
4. A. Shlonsky

Citations in the corpus

• Confidence and Professional Judgment in Assessing Children’s Risk of Abuse (2010, methodology): “This decisionmaking process requires the application of clinical judgment to standardized risk assessment measures (Shlonsky & Wagner, 2005; Schwalbe, 2008).”
• Using Resilience to Reconceptualise Child Protection Workforce Capacity (2009, background): “…of mandatory reporting requirements and risk assessment tools which claimed an actuarial objectivity to assessment of the risk to children, for example, helped to operationalise this deficit orientation (Leschied, Chiodo, Whitehead, Hurley, & Marshall, 2003; Pelton, 2008; Shlonsky & Wagner, 2005).”
• Children in the public benefit system at risk of maltreatment: identification via predictive modeling. (2013, background): “The value of clinical versus statistical prediction has been long debated in the delivery of human services,(16) including child protection.(17,18) In the case of child protection decision making, there is clear evidence that actuarial approaches are superior to clinical attempts to balance the comp”