The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies.

By F. Gláucia, R. Marcos, Oliveira Fereguetti Tatiani, R. Ana. 2013

1,538 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e7583225cdd21299d847729ccd007eecbe1549f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Gabriele Giorgi

Citations in the corpus

• Migrant Workers and Psychological Health: A Systematic Review (2019, methodology): “We used the International Narrative Systematic Assessment (INSA) method [17] to judge the quality of narrative reviews, AMSTAR to evaluate systematic reviews , and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale to evaluate cross-sectional, cohort studies, and case control studies [18], while the JADAD scale was applied”
• Overweight, obesity and central obesity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2012, methodology): “Quality of the included studies was assessed using criteria based on the Newcastle–Ottawa scale for non-randomized studies (Wells et al., 2010).”