Techniques for image enhancement and segmentation of tomographic images of porous materials
By Adrian P. Sheppard, R. Sok, H. Averdunk. 2004
420 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Mechanics of Materials, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1e4ef25cc0f3bc78f4b7e3bbd306a3607cf770e4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Ryan T. Armstrong
- D. Wildenschild
- M. Porter
- Martin J. Blunt
- Branko Bijeljic
- Matthew Andrew
- Zhishang Liu
- S. Berg
In Mechanics of Materials
- Martin J. Blunt
- Branko Bijeljic
- Matthew Andrew
- S. Berg
- Ryan T. Armstrong
- Zhishang Liu
- A. Herring
- Christoph H. Arns
In Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Martin J. Blunt
- Branko Bijeljic
- Matthew Andrew
- D. Wildenschild
- T. Gebrenegus
- Markus Tuller
- P. Iassonov
- Marco Stampanoni
Citations in the corpus
- Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review (2014, methodology): “…we will examine hysteresis segmentation [Vogel and Kretzschmar, 1996], indicator kriging [Oh and Lindquist, 1999], converging active contours [Sheppard et al., 2004], watershed segmentation [Vincent and Soille, 1991], and Bayesian Markov random field segmentation [Kulkarni et al., 2012].”
- Pore-scale contact angle measurements at reservoir conditions using X-ray microtomography (2014, methodology): “As segmentation of images containing a partial saturation of multiple fluids is significantly more difficult than the segmentation of dry images [32], the use of simple grey-scale segmentation was insufficient.”
- Investigating the geometrical structure of disordered sphere packings (2004, methodology): “After segmentation (see Sheppard et al in this issue [8]) the sample data sets are reduced to threedimensional binary images, representing two distinct phases, one associated with the spheres and the other with air space.”
- Image analysis algorithms for estimating porous media multiphase flow variables from computed microtomography data: a validation study (2010, background): “, [32, 34, 35, 38, 48]), and Sezgin and Sankur [47] provide a comprehensive survey of 40 segmentation methods.”
- Pore‐by‐pore capillary pressure measurements using X‐ray microtomography at reservoir conditions: Curvature, snap‐off, and remobilization of residual CO2 (2014, methodology): “The segmentation of images containing a partial saturation of multiple fluids is significantly more complicated than the segmentation of dry images, so the use of simple gray scale universal thresholding was insufficient [Sheppard et al., 2004].”
- Pore-Scale Characterization of Two-Phase Flow Using Integral Geometry (2017, methodology): “The images were segmented using gradient-based imaged segmentation techniques (Schlüter et al. 2014; Sheppard et al. 2004) and the identified WP andNWPwere characterized using image quantification software that has been presented elsewhere (Arns et al.”
- Segmentation of X‐ray computed tomography images of porous materials: A crucial step for characterization and quantitative analysis of pore structures (2009, methodology): “…considered as a refinement of global thresholding based on local spatial information such as a two-point local covariance function of the image [Oh and Lindquist, 1999; Mardia and Hainsworth, 1988], or edge detection [Yanowitz and Bruckstein, 1989; Hertz and Schafer, 1988; Sheppard et al., 2004].”
- Imaging and image processing in porous media research (2008, background): “[37] combined diffusion filters and unsharp mask [24] edge enhancement for tomographic images of porous materials.”