Imaging and image processing in porous media research
By Anders Kaestner, E. Lehmann, Marco Stampanoni. 2008
235 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Geophysics, Mechanical Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4dc4c0e50312ac79dc34e71ecd2af210e026566c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Geophysics
In Mechanical Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Neutron imaging of hydrogen-rich fluids in geomaterials and engineered porous media: A review (2014, background): “1 to 1 mm length scales in terms of sample size and image resolution (Kaestner et al., 2008).”
- Image processing of multiphase images obtained via X‐ray microtomography: A review (2014, methodology): “Progress in image progressing has kept a comparable pace in terms of new developments in image enhancement, image analysis, and hardware architectures [e.g., Ketcham and Carlson, 2001; Sheppard et al., 2004; Kaestner et al., 2008; Porter and Wildenschild, 2010; Tuller et al., 2013].”
- New Local Thresholding Method for Soil Images by Minimizing Grayscale Intra‐Class Variance (2013, methodology): “Nevertheless, the method requires the selection and application of a filtering step before thresholding, which, according to Kaestner et al. (2008), may have significant effects on segmentation results.”
- Image analysis algorithms for estimating porous media multiphase flow variables from computed microtomography data: a validation study (2010, methodology): “[23] proposed using a gradient image smoothed by a Gaussian filter for c (x, t) in Eq.”
- Segmentation of X‐ray computed tomography images of porous materials: A crucial step for characterization and quantitative analysis of pore structures (2009, methodology): “Although image enhancement can have significant effects on segmentation results, and a detailed investigation of the effect of different filtering methods is of interest [see, e.g., Kaestner et al., 2008], it was not the objective of this study.”