An Experimental Template for Case Study Research

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

On doing better science: From thrill of discovery to policy implications (2017, background): “There are, however, many appropriate ways to conduct qualitative research bearing in mind sampling issues (Geddes, 2003; Gerring, 2007), measurement reliability (Wright, 2016), and counterfactual thinking (Geddes, 2003; Gerring, 2007; Gerring & McDermott, 2007).”
On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations (2018, methodology): “…are comparable to existing case study frameworks for generating counterfactuals (see, e.g., "polar opposites" and "experimental template for case study research", Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007; Gerring & McDermott, 2007), which makes them closer also to the experience of qualitative researchers.”
Putting Typologies to Work (2012, methodology): “Approaches to Comparative Analysis (Kohli 1995) Case Study Research Designs (Gerring and McDermott 2007) Explanations of Action (Parsons 2006) Possible Outcomes of a Hypotheses Test (Vogt 2005) Survey Questions (Martin 1984) Theories of Modernization and Development (Janos 1986) Theories of…”
Who survived? Ethiopia's regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs (2015, unknown): “while holding place and national culture constant (Gerring and McDermott, 2007).”