Explaining Spatial Variation in Support for Capital Punishment: A Multilevel Analysis1

By Eric P. Baumer, S. Messner, R. Rosenfeld. American Journal of Sociology, 2003

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1de134fa81f76d7aa0d8c6fe5f6d8431ab0e56f6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. James D. Unnever
2. F. Cullen
3. Travis C. Pratt
4. Alex R. Piquero
5. R. Agnew
6. Nicole Leeper Piquero
7. Kevin M. Beaver

In Sociology and Political Science

1. James D. Unnever
2. F. Cullen
3. Travis C. Pratt
4. Kevin M. Beaver
5. Alex R. Piquero
6. J. Wright
7. M. Delisi
8. R. Agnew

Citations in the corpus

• EXECUTING THE INNOCENT AND SUPPORT FOR CAPITAL PUNISHMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC POLICY (2005, background): “Some studies report that Christian fundamentalists are more likely to support capital punishment (Grasmick and McGill, 1994; Young, 1992, 2000), whereas other research reports a null relationship (Applegate et al., 2000; Baumer et al., 2003; Sandys and McGarrell, 1997; Soss et al., 2003; Unnever and”