EXECUTING THE INNOCENT AND SUPPORT FOR CAPITAL PUNISHMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC POLICY

By James D. Unnever, F. Cullen. 2005

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/defe39bbabb78381267d378f7c11a658f49b9f63

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. James D. Unnever
2. F. Cullen
3. Nicole Leeper Piquero
4. Stephanie E Carmichael
5. A. Schoepfer
6. John K. Cochran
7. Stephen W. Baron
8. Alex R. Piquero

In Sociology and Political Science

1. James D. Unnever
2. F. Cullen
3. Nicole Leeper Piquero
4. Stephanie E Carmichael
5. A. Schoepfer
6. John K. Cochran
7. B. Applegate
8. Alex R. Piquero

Citations in the corpus

• The Pragmatic American: Attributions of Crime and the Hydraulic Relation Hypothesis (2010, background): “For example, Unnever and Cullen (2005) found that the wording of the death penalty question affects the percentage of people who report that they support capital punishment.”
• Do perceptions of punishment vary between white-collar and street crimes? (2007, result): “On this score, then, the results from this study were descriptive and might be used as a sort of barometer of public opinion (i.e., it is important to know what the public thinks about punishment) (see Unnever & Cullen, 2005; Zimring & Hawkins, 1973).”