Ecology of Transgenic Crops

By M. Marvier. American Scientist, 2001

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1dc516144c82c75b68a5b453f40d1cacdaffa6e0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

The Myth of Coexistence: Why Transgenic Crops Are Not Compatible With Agroecologically Based Systems of Production (2005, background): “The first important argument against the concept of coexistence is that the movement of transgenes beyond their intended destinations and hybridization with weedy relatives and contamination of other nonGM crops is a virtual certainty (Marvier, 2001).”
Ecological Effects of Transgenic Crops and the Escape of Transgenes into Wild Populations (2004, background): “The potential for increased weediness in feral crops has been discussed widely (Snow & Moran-Palma 1997, Rissler & Mellon 1996, Warwick et al. 1999, Marvier 2001) but has received relatively little empirical attention.”
Evaluation of dietary effects of transgenic corn pollen expressing Cry3Bb1 protein on a non‐target ladybird beetle, Coleomegilla maculata (2002, background): “Marvier (2001) criticized certain regulatory non-”
Long-Term Assessment of the Effects of Transgenic Bt Cotton on the Function of the Natural Enemy Community (2005, methodology): “Because many predator taxa are known to prey on B. tabaci (Gerling et al. 2001, Naranjo 2001), an unweighted predator:prey ratio also was estimated based on the summed density of all predator taxa sampled to all life stages ofB. tabaci combined per leaf.”
Long-Term Assessment of the Effects of Transgenic Bt Cotton on the Abundance of Nontarget Arthropod Natural Enemies (2005, background): “…to other organisms, food safety, loss of susceptibility to Bt toxins in target pests, disruption of ecosystem processes, and direct or indirect effects on nontarget organisms and biodiversity (Cannon 2000, Wolfenbarger and Phifer 2000, Marvier 2001, Shelton et al. 2002, Conner et al. 2003).”