Proficiency Level and the Interaction of Lexical and Morphosyntactic Information During L2 Sentence Processing

By Carrie N. Jackson. 2008

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d7a8d4e1b823d13f01154ea7a891d5c314e92e9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Christos Pliatsikas
2. T. Marinis

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Christos Pliatsikas
2. T. Marinis

In Language and Linguistics

1. Christos Pliatsikas
2. T. Marinis

Citations in the corpus

• Processing empty categories in a second language: When naturalistic exposure fills the (intermediate) gap* (2012, background): “There is strong evidence that L2 proficiency is an important factor for L2 syntactic processing (Frenck-Mestre, 2002; Hahne, 2001; Hopp, 2006; Jackson, 2008) and there is also some evidence that L2 learners’ WM capacity can influence their realtime L2 syntactic processing (Dussias & Piñar, 2010;…”
• Parsing and Working Memory in Bilingual Sentence Processing (2016, unknown): “…L1 and L2 speakers initially adopt syntactically simple analyses of ambiguous sentences (Dussias & Cramer Scaltz, 2008; Frenck-Mestre & Pynte, 1997; Hopp, 2015; Jackson, 2008; Jacob & Felser, 2016, Jegerski, 2012; Juffs, 1998; Juffs & Harrington, 1996; Rah & Adone, 2010; Roberts & Felser, 2011).”