Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences
By B. Kaltenborn, T. Bjerke. 2002
411 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d782c342b6f5d83f4fc7dade13a383f6e373d35
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
In Sociology and Political Science
- Julie Ernst
- A. Buijs
- Fernando Lera-López
- Natalia López-Mosquera
- Christer Thrane
- Mercedes Sánchez
- M. V. Winsum-Westra
- Anna M. Roberts
Citations in the corpus
- Representing climate change futures: a critique on the use of images for visual communication (2005, neutral): “…for landscape design and preferences (examples include Bell, 2001; Clay & Daniel, 2000; Daniel & Meitner, 2001; Gimblett, Daniel, Cherry, & Meitner, 2001; Hands & Brown, 2002; Kaltenborn & Bjerke, 2002; Lange, 1994; Misgav, 2000; Orland, 1994; Pullar & Tidey, 2001; Purcell, Peron, & Berto, 2001).”
- Preservice early childhood educators’ perceptions of outdoor settings as learning environments (2012, background): “For example, Kaltenborn and Bjerke (2002) suggest people with anthropocentric values prefer managed landscapes, in contrast with people with ecocentric values preferring wild landscapes, and preferences for managed landscapes are related to functional images of nature, while preferences for natural…”
- An Extended Planned Behavior Model to Explain the Willingness to Pay to Reduce Noise Pollution in Road Transportation (2018, background): “This is an important contribution given the growing interest in including the role of people's attitudes and responses towards specific environmental impacts (Kaltenborn and Bjerke, 2002) within their personal values.”
- Manicured, romantic, or wild? The relation between need for structure and preferences for garden styles (2010, background): “…mechanisms underlying individual differences in preferences for natural settings have increasingly become the focus of theoretical and empirical efforts (Kaltenborn and Bjerke, 2002; Koole and Van den Berg, 2005; Özgüner and Kendle, 2006; Van den Berg and Koole, 2006; Jorgensen and Tylecote, 2007).”
- Lay People's Images of Nature: Comprehensive Frameworks of Values, Beliefs, and Value Orientations (2009, background): “2. Sometimes also more general values, like ‘‘anthropocentric values’’ are called value orientations (e.g., Kaltenborn and Bjerke 2002 ).”
- Resident Attitudes Towards Mountain Second-Home Tourism Development in Norway: The Effects of Environmental Attitudes (2008, background): “In another study among residents in Roros, Norway, the ecocentric attitude was positively correlated with a landscape preference for wild lands with water, and for historic cultural landscapes, while the anthropocentric attitude was positively correlated with more modern farm landscapes ( Kaltenborn”
- Understanding the role of assigned values in natural resource management (2010, background): “It is said that people evaluate environmental dilemmas by expressing their value orientations or held values (Kaltenborn & Bjerke 2002), and that much of the conflict over the environment can 144 AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT—Volume 17 been attributed to basic differences in…”