The impact of stocking density on the welfare of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

By B. North, J. Turnbull, T. Ellis, M. Porter, H. Migaud, James E. Bron, N. Bromage. 2006

350 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Immunology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d777ccd8f0ca5d78a53d05d01782312a8b4affe

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

1. J. Schrama
2. Johan Verreth
3. G. A. Santos
4. D. McKenzie
5. A. Farrell
6. P. V. Skov
7. B. Poli
8. I. Lupatsch

In Immunology

1. J. Schrama
2. Johan Verreth
3. G. A. Santos
4. M. Tuzcu
5. H. Yazlak
6. C. Orhan
7. A. Farrell
8. F. Akdemir

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. D. McKenzie
2. A. Farrell
3. P. V. Skov
4. B. Poli
5. Johan Verreth
6. S. Cooke
7. S. Hinch
8. D. Patterson

Citations in the corpus

• Effect of stocking density and feeding level on energy expenditure and stress responsiveness in European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax (2010, background): “(Jørgensen et al., 1993; North et al., 2006) where an increase in growth with increasing density of up to 120 kg m−3 was described.”
• Farmed fish welfare-suffering assessment and impact on product quality (2009, background): “North et al. (2006) reported that stocking density of 80 kg m-3 did not produce consistent effects on rainbow trout mean growth rate or physiological indicators of welfare, but fin erosion increased with increasing density (10, 40, 80 kg m-3), although the cause of the erosion remains unclear.”
• The biological requirements for post-smolt Atlantic salmon in closed-containment systems (2011, background): “Aggressive behaviour then causes fin and body damage, as well as subordinate behaviours with reduce growth rate in the subordinates and increased size variation among fish within a tank (Jobling, 1995; North et al., 2006).”
• The effect of lycopene on antioxidant status in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) reared under high stocking density (2014, positive): “Uniform sized fish were selected from a large population, weighed and randomly distributed in experimental 1073 L fiberglass tanks under low (20 kg m3−1) and high (100 kg m3−1) stocking densities according to previous studies related to rainbow trout farming practices (North et al., 2006; Trenzado e”
• Effect of stocking density on growth performance, serum biochemical parameters, and muscle texture properties of genetically improved farm tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (2018, background): “However, high stocking density has been considered as stressor in the aquaculture (North et al. 2006).”
• Effects of stocking density and sustained aerobic exercise on growth, energetics and welfare of rainbow trout (2012, background): “One explanation may be that Houlihan and Laurent (1987) reared their fish at relatively low density, which is known to cause increased aggressive interactions and dominance hierarchies in rainbow trout (North et al., 2006).”
• Effects of stocking density on haematological parameters, growth and fin erosion of great sturgeon (Huso huso) juveniles (2008, background): “Susceptibility and mode of action for ¢ndamage is likely tovarybetweendi¡erent ¢ns (North et al. 2006).”