Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach.
By Haitao Chu, Stephen R. Cole. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
677 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d1d4ad81c4f1acc6154707af12367fce4d7ca89
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Ian R. White
- Dan Jackson
- R. Riley
- Catherine Hewitt
- D. Richards
- S. Gilbody
- S. Brealey
- Georgia Salanti
Citations in the corpus
- Screening for Depression in Medical Settings with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ): A Diagnostic Meta-Analysis (2007, methodology): “Our analysis used the generalized linear mixed model approach to bivariate meta-analysis.(27) Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC) curves are the most informative way of representing the inherent trade-offs between sensitivity and specificity for a test or diagnostic instrument.”
- Multivariate meta-analysis: Potential and promise (2011, background): “Perhaps the most common medical application of multivariate meta-analysis is the bivariate metaanalysis of studies of diagnostic test accuracy [5, 28].”
- Multivariate meta‐analysis: the effect of ignoring within‐study correlation (2009, methodology): “…1997; Gail et al., 2000), prognostic markers (Riley, Abrams, Lambert, Sutton and Thompson, 2007), diagnostic tests (Reitsma et al., 2005; Chu and Cole, 2006; Riley, Abrams, Sutton, Lambert and Thompson, 2007; Harbord et al., 2007) and genetic epidemiology (Thompson et al., 2005), among others.”