D. Richards
Statistics and Probability · 2006–2007
A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 3 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 9 citations into it
Whom D. Richards trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts D. Richards overall
Papers from D. Richards's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers D. Richards trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
- Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (Annals of Internal Medicine)
- Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
- How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (Statistics in Medicine)
- Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- Detecting and monitoring depression with a two-item questionnaire (PHQ-2). (Journal of Psychosomatic Research)
- The Patient Health Questionnaire-2: Validity of a Two-Item Depression Screener (Medical Care)
- Comparative validity of three screening questionnaires for DSM-IV depressive disorders and physicians' diagnoses. (Journal of Affective Disorders)
- Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
- The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)