Estimation of controlled direct effects

By S. Goetgeluk, Stijn Vansteelandt, Els Goetghebeur. 2008

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1cfadfe45321e5f26f190d544fd87781a3aad1f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

Citations in the corpus

Bias-Reduced Doubly Robust Estimation (2015, background): “3 effects (Goetgeluk et al. 2008) and natural direct and indirect effects in mediation analysis (Tchetgen Tchetgen and Shpitser 2012; Zheng and van der Laan 2012), for average effects of time varying treatments (Murphy et al.”
Causality, mediation and time: a dynamic viewpoint (2012, background): “As another example, Goetgeluk et al. (2009) discussed various ways to estimate direct effects within the counterfactual framework.”
Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition (2009, methodology): “…mediator-outcome confounders but estimation in such cases requires techniques beyond simple regression analysis (Robins, 1999; van der Laan and Petersen, 2008; Conceptual issues concerning mediation, interventions and composition 461 Goetgeluk et al., 2008; VanderWeele, 2009a; Vansteelandt, 2009).”
Controlled direct and mediated effects: definition, identification and bounds (2010, background): “…is a considerable causal inference literature on the estimation of controlled direct effects (Robins, 1999; Petersen et al., 2006; Ten Have et al., 2007; Goetgeluk et al., 2008; van der Laan & Petersen, 2008; Sobel, 2008; VanderWeele, 2009b; VanderWeele & Vansteelandt, 2009; Vansteelandt, 2009).”
Quantifying an Adherence Path-Specific Effect of Antiretroviral Therapy in the Nigeria PEPFAR Program (2014, background): “uch attention in recent causal inference literature (Robins and Greenland, 1992; Robins, 1999, 2003; Pearl, 2001; Avin et al., 2005; Taylor et al., 2005; Petersen et al., 2006; Ten Have et al., 2007; Goetgeluk et al., 2008; van der Laan and Petersen, 2008; VanderWeele, 2009, 2011; VanderWeele and Va”
On Partial Identification of the Pure Direct Effect (2015, background): “The study of causal mediation has in recent years enjoyed an explosion in popularity (Robins and Greenland, 1992; Robins, 1999, 2003; Pearl, 2001; Avin et al., 2005; Taylor et al., 2005; Petersen et al., 2006; Ten Have et al., 2007; Albert, 2008; Goetgeluk et al., 2008; van der Laan and Petersen, 20”
Augmented designs to assess principal strata direct effects (2011, methodology): “Various identification and estimation strategies for CDEs and NDEs and NIEs have been developed (e.g. Robins and Greenland (1992), Pearl (2001), Robins (2003), Petersen et al. (2006), Geneletti (2007), Goetgeluk et al. (2008), Flores and Flores-Lagunes (2009a,b, 2010) and Imai et al. (2010b)).”
Estimation of direct effects for survival data by using the Aalen additive hazards model (2011, methodology): “The idea behind sequential G-estimation (Goetgeluk et al., 2008; Vansteelandt, 2009) is that, after ‘removal’ of the effect of the mediator from the outcome (i.e. after removal of the arrow in Fig.”