Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science

528 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality (2023, background): “This contrasts with the systematic multi-step reasoning approach that learns to apply underlying computational rules required for building correct answers [53, 31, 23].”
Reasoning in Non-probabilistic Uncertainty: Logic Programming and Neural-Symbolic Computing as Examples (2017, methodology): “Nonetheless, LP (with the semantics as specified by Stenning and van Lambalgen [56]) is intensional in the general philosophical sense: its predicates are defined in terms of ‘senses’ which are cashed out as algorithms (completion), and its closed-world reasoning conditionals are ‘licences for infer”
Against Logical Form (2010, background): “They can be determined only from the meaning of the sentence in context, which depends in part on knowledge, and even, as Stenning and Van Lambalgen (2008) suggest, on the particulars of an inferential task.”
Mental models and human reasoning (2010, unknown): “Its extraction can depend in turn on reasoning itself (13) with the consequent danger of an infinite regress.”
On Conditionals (2015, methodology): “Following the approach presented in [29], we represent implications as licenses for implications by adding abnormality predicates ab1 and ab2.”