Nuclear markers reveal unexpected genetic variation and a Congolese-Nilotic origin of the Lake Victoria cichlid species flock

By Ole Seehausen, E. Koetsier, M. Schneider, L. Chapman, Colin A. Chapman, M. Knight, G. Turner, J. V. Alphen, R. Bills. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 2003

163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Phylogenetic analyses based on mitochondrial (mt) DNA have indicated that the cichlid species flock of the Lake Victoria region is derived from a single ancestral species found in East African rivers, closely related to the ancestor of the Lake Malawi cichlid species flock. The Lake Victoria flock contains ten times less mtDNA variation than the Lake Malawi radiation, consistent with current estimates of the ages of the lakes. We present results of a phylogenetic investigation using nuclear (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers and a wider coverage of riverine haplochromines. We demonstrate that the Lake Victoria–Edward flock is derived from the morphologically and ecologically diverse cichlid genus Thoracochromis from the Congo and Nile, rather than from the phenotypically conservative East African Astatotilapia. This implies that the ability to express much of the morphological diversity found in the species flock may by far pre–date the origin of the flock. Our data indicate that the nuclear diversity of the Lake Victoria–Edward species flock is similar to that of the Lake Malawi flock, indicating that the genetic diversity is considerably older than the 15 000 years that have passed since the lake began to refill. Most of this variation is manifested in trans–species polymorphisms, indicating very recent cladogenesis from a genetically very diverse founder stock. Our data do not confirm strict monophyly of either of the species flocks, but raise the possibility that these flocks have arisen from hybrid swarms.

Subfields: Aquatic Science, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1cd66dc6fe05fc42d976a58aa6c212b14c9777ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Aquatic Science

  1. K. Martens
  2. I. Schön
  3. P. Dijkstra
  4. Ole Seehausen
  5. Ton G. G. Groothuis

In Ecology

  1. I. Schön
  2. K. Martens
  3. F. Volckaert
  4. J. Ballard
  5. M. Whitlock
  6. P. Dijkstra
  7. Ole Seehausen
  8. Ton G. G. Groothuis

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. F. Volckaert
  2. M. Whitlock
  3. K. Martens
  4. I. Schön
  5. Ole Seehausen

Citations in the corpus