Essential psychology for environmental policy making
By C. Vlek. 2000
137 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c7e33d5fa65a97cd0f6645a71e48a80ae16f5ed
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
In Marketing
Citations in the corpus
- Psychology's essential role in alleviating the impacts of climate change. (2008, background): “A number of psychologists (e.g., Paul Stern) already are fully occupied in this crucial enterprise, and others have strongly advocated it (e.g., Vlek, 2000), but not enough of us are stepping off campus to do it.”
- The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011, unknown): “file 4 shows the frameworks and gives a brief description of each [11,12,16,27-42].”
- Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental Behaviour can both Thwart and Foster Well-Being (2013, unknown): “The positive effects of one‘s individual pro-environmental behaviours on the condition of the earth are thus uncertain, complex, and situated in the future—in contrast to the personal benefits of environmentally harmful behaviour such as car use, which are certain, simple, and immediate [26].”
- The life cycle costing (LCC) approach: a conceptual discussion of its usefulness for environmental decision-making (2004, background): “large amounts of complex information results in lack of attention for new problems such as environmental problems [59].”
- Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour : An integrative review and research agenda (2009, background): “Various strategies for behaviour change have been identified, each focusing on a different set of behavioural determinants (e.g., De Young, 1993; Gardner & Stern, 2002; Geller, 2002; Geller, Winett, & Everett, 1982; Messick & Brewer, 1983; Vlek, 2000).”
- Personally Relevant Climate Change (2013, background): “Engaging the public in climate change issues is a particularly challenging endeavor because the impacts are often perceived to be uncertain, in the distant future, and not personally relevant (Gifford, 2008; Lorenzoni et al., 2007; Vlek, 2000).”
- New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior (2000, unknown): “Researchers are beginning to propose such models (e.g., Dahlstrand & Biel, 1997; Fransson & Garling, 1999; Gardner & Stern, 1996; Hines, Hungerford, & Tomera, 1987; Olander & Thogerson, 1995; Stern & Oskamp, 1987; Vlek, 2000 ).”
- The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. (2011, background): “Psychologists and other social scientists have an important role to play if the many psychological barriers are to be overcome (e.g., Gifford, 2007b, 2008; Spence, Pidgeon, & Uzzell, 2009; Vlek, 2000).”