A standardized boundary element method volume conductor model.

By M. Fuchs, J. Kastner, M. Wagner, S. Hawes, J. S. Ebersole. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2002

1,005 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

EEG source imaging. (2004, background): “…of equivalent dipoles on source depth (Yvert et al., 1996), on the noise level (Achim et al., 1991; Vanrumste et al., 2002; Whittingstall et al., 2003), on the number of recording electrodes (Krings et al., 1999; Yvert et al., 1996), and on the head model (Cuffin et al., 2001; Fuchs et al., 2002).”
EEG-vigilance and BOLD effect during simultaneous EEG/fMRI measurement (2009, positive): “The electric lead field used was developed using the boundary method of the MNI152 template (Fuchs et al., 2002).”
Emerging Neurophysiological Specialization for Letter Strings (2005, methodology): “All solutions were computed within a realistic boundary element head model (CURRYsoftware; Fuchs, Kastner, Wagner, Hawes, & Ebersole, 2002; Fuchs, Wagner, & Kastner, 2001), along with a constrained two-dipole solution assuming mirrorsymmetric location and orientation.,Although inverse solutions ar”
Spontaneous brain activity and EEG microstates. A novel EEG/fMRI analysis approach to explore resting-state networks (2010, methodology): “In the current implementation of sLORETA, computations were made in a realistic head model (Fuchs et al., 2002), using the MNI152 template (Mazziotta et al.”