Reconstructing Program Theories: Methods Available and Problems to be Solved
By F. Leeuw. 2003
286 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c5a8c0b5fe6f7e09d7a122fa3f686e735c0bc31
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- Carl D. Westine
- Daniela C. Schröter
- Frans Leeuw
- Chris L. S. Coryn
- Scott R. Rosas
- Lindsay A. Noakes
- B. Astbury
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Carl D. Westine
- Daniela C. Schröter
- Frans Leeuw
- Chris L. S. Coryn
- Scott R. Rosas
- Lindsay A. Noakes
- B. Astbury
Citations in the corpus
- A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990 to 2009 (2011, methodology): “Generally, the methods applied comport well and share many features with those illustrated by Leeuw (2003) for retrospectively reconstructing program theory, although not all theory formulation was a post hoc activity following implementation of a program, and in a minority of cases preceded…”
- Concept Mapping as a Technique for Program Theory Development (2005, methodology): “Leeuw (2003) recently suggested that methods for constructing program theory could be organized into the policy-scientific, strategic assessment, and elicitation approaches.”
- Unpacking Black Boxes: Mechanisms and Theory Building in Evaluation (2010, methodology): “Often evaluators recommend using a combination of these approaches, drawing on both primary and secondary data sources and multiple research methodologies (e.g., Donaldson, 2007, Connell, Kubish, Schorr, & Weiss, 1995; Leeuw, 2003; Pawson & Tilley, 1997).”