Social-cognitive factors of donating money to charity, with special attention to an international relief organization
By C. Cheung, Cm Chan. 2000
193 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Health, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bfe89cad3d223d7e1905d0ec6da9b2c54fe0674
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Health
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
- Pamala Wiepking
- René Bekkers
- T. James
- Hanna Zagefka
- F. Handy
- Sara Konrath
- Rupert Brown
- Zachary I. Moore
Citations in the corpus
- The Psychology of Charitable Donations to Disaster Victims and Beyond (2015, background): “Different models explaining donations to disaster relief campaigns have been proposed (e.g., Cheung & Chan, 2000; Oosterhof, Heuvelman, & Peters, 2009).”
- A Literature Review of Empirical Studies of Philanthropy (2010, background): “A survey study on intentions to donate to international relief organizations also reveals a positive effect of need (Cheung & Chan, 2000).”
- Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money (2010, unknown): “Though effects of need are generally weak, people are more willing to contribute money to charities that help more needy and deserving beneficiaries (Cheung and Chan, 2000; Wagner and Wheeler, 1969).”
- Donating to disaster victims: Responses to natural and humanly caused events (2011, unknown): “Attributions have also been linked specifically to willingness to donate (Campbell et al., 2001; Cheung & Chan, 2000).”
- Predictors of Young People's Charitable Intentions to Donate Money: An Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective (2012, unknown): “…research on the factors influencing charitable giving have focused on demographic characteristics (e.g., Bryant, Jeon-Slaughter, Kang, & Tax, 2003; Cheung & Chan, 2000; Konkoly & Perloff, 1990; Lee & Chang, 2007), which, while important, do not provide an explanation for why people choose to…”