Isolation from mammalian predators differentially affects two congeners

By Daniel T. Blumstein, Janice C. Daniel. 2002

125 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bea8a21f64166d6e85cc7d6388b1630d7d9c5c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Genetics

Citations in the corpus

Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear : how life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds (2006, background): “For instance, in those species where cover is obstructive, individuals in obstructive cover are warier than those in open areas (e.g. Blumstein & Daniel 2002).”
Coyotes and recolonizing wolves: social rank mediates risk-conditional behaviour at ungulate carcasses (2008, background): “…size or configuration (Creel & Winnie 2005), preemptive aggression (Bertram 1978; Gese 1999) and retreat to refuge habitats (Formanowicz & Bobka 1988; Blumstein & Daniel 2002), either independently or interactively, may prove crucial in mediating interspecific interactions in social carnivores.”
Responses of elk herd size to fine-scale spatial and temporal variation in the risk of predation by wolves (2005, unknown): “If food limitation differs among sites, or the intensity of predation differs, then it is likely that the optimal trade-off between foraging and antipredator responses will also differ (Messier 1994; Abramsky et al. 2002; Blumstein & Daniel 2002; Heithaus & Dill 2002).”
What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance? (2008, background): “The lack of a relationship between vigilance and group size has also been noted frequently in mammals (e.g., Treves 2000; Laundré et al. 2001; Blumstein and Daniel 2002; Cameron and Du Toit 2005) indicating that avian and mammalian results are not qualitatively different and that the lack of a…”
Learning, memory and predator avoidance by freshwater snails: effects of experience on predator recognition and defensive strategy (2006, background): “Additional tests on populations in isolated habitats that have been predator-free for a long period will show whether selection favours the loss of plasticity in the absence of predators, as has been shown for some mammalian taxa (e.g. Blumstein & Daniel 2002, 2003).”
Predator-prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions (2010, background): “In some cases, prey have apparently retained their antipredator behavior for hundreds or even thousands of years after predator local extinction (Byers 1997, Coss 1999, Blumstein and Daniel 2002, Blumstein 2006).”
Relaxed selection in the wild. (2009, background): “The simplest explanation for trait persistence is maintenance by remaining sources of selection for the same or a different function [ 32 ].”
Moving to suburbia: ontogenetic and evolutionary consequences of life on predator‐free islands (2002, methodology): “This latter conclusion is supported by the presence of group size effects in western grey kangaroos at Tutanning and their complete loss on Kangaroo Island where adult kangaroos have much less to fear from wedge-tailed eagles than do tammars (Blumstein & Daniel, 2002).”
The Multipredator Hypothesis and the Evolutionary Persistence of Antipredator Behavior (2006, background): “9500 yr on Kangaroo Island, South Australia, lost group size effects – the systematic change in time allocated to vigilance and foraging as a function of group size (Blumstein & Daniel 2002).”
DO INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES INFLUENCE FLIGHT INITIATION DISTANCE? (2004, background): “In these cases, sampling different locations is the only way to avoid pseudoreplication if subjects are neither marked nor otherwise individually identifiable (e.g., Blumstein and Daniel 2002, Blumstein et al. 2003).”
Sociality in New World hystricognath rodents is linked to predators and burrow digging (2006, background): “Note, however, that overhead cover may have no effect against ground-dwelling predators such as snakes (Pierce et al., 1992), and some species (e.g., larger-bodied kangaroos) might actually find cover obstructive (Blumstein and Daniel, 2002).”