DO INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES INFLUENCE FLIGHT INITIATION DISTANCE?

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Evaluating methods to quantify anthropogenic stressors on wild animals (2007, methodology): “When quantifying human impacts, FID is best used by comparing ‘disturbed’ and ‘undisturbed’ populations, where differences should be attributable to differential habituation (Ikuta and Blumstein, 2003; Runyan and Blumstein, 2004).”
Development of boldness and docility in yellow-bellied marmots (2013, methodology): “Observers were trained until they consistently walked at a 0.5 m/s pace across a variety of terrains (Runyan & Blumstein 2004).”
Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear : how life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds (2006, background): “A modest degree of resampling subjects has been shown to not influence the results of studies like this (Runyan & Blumstein 2004).”
Body size and reserve protection affect flight initiation distance in parrotfishes (2009, background): “FID reductions as a result of human exposure, however, can be minor (Frid and Dill 2002), variable among individuals (Runyan and Blumstein 2004) or even increase with non-threatening exposure (Thiel et al.”