Evaluation measures for preference judgments
By Ben Carterette, Paul N. Bennett. 2008
47 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Information Systems, Management Science and Operations Research, Evaluation & Benchmarks
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Information Systems
- C. Clarke
- Jimmy J. Lin
- Cheng-hsin Luo
- Kai Hui
- Nick Craswell
- Ellen M. Voorhees
- Mark D. Smucker
- Klaus Berberich
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Nick Craswell
- Cheng-hsin Luo
- Mark D. Smucker
- Gianluca Demartini
- Ellen M. Voorhees
- C. Clarke
- Xinyi Yan
- Ilya Segal
In Evaluation & Benchmarks
- C. Clarke
- Nick Craswell
- Mark D. Smucker
- Cheng-hsin Luo
- Alexandra Vtyurina
- Kai Hui
- Klaus Berberich
- Gianluca Demartini
Citations in the corpus
- Human Preferences as Dueling Bandits (2022, methodology): “Others propose and explore measures based on counts of correctly ordered items – according to the preference judgments — or measures that convert preferences to gain values for use with NDCG and other standard evaluation measures [6, 32, 35, 36].”
- Preferences on a Budget: Prioritizing Document Pairs when Crowdsourcing Relevance Judgments (2022, background): “Previous research has also proposed measures to evaluate IR systems in the presence of incomplete preference judgments [4, 30].”
- What Makes Them Click: Empirical Analysis of Consumer Demand for Search Advertising (2012, methodology): “Another frequently used frameworks is a “cascade model” (Craswell, Zoeter, Taylor, and Ramsey (2008), Papadimitriou and Zhang (2008)).”
- Low-Cost Preference Judgment via Ties (2017, background): “In other words, the relative rankings between them are not considered in the evaluation as in [2].”
- Shallow pooling for sparse labels (2021, background): “Extensive work by Carterette and various collaborator also indicate potential benefits from pairwise preference judgments [5, 45, 3, 4], including improved assessment speed and accuracy.”
- Assessing Top- Preferences (2020, background): “In a recent SIGIR 2020 paper, Sakai and Zeng [32] propose and explore two broad families of measures intended to support preference judgments. e rst family is based on counts of concordant pairs, generalizing and extending ideas proposed by Cartere e et al. [7] and Cartere e and Benne [6]. e second ”
- Evaluation Measures Based on Preference Graphs (2021, methodology): “This effort to establish preference based evaluation directly inspired the work of Sakai and Zeng [26] who greatly expand and explore the family of measures defined in Carterette and Bennett [6].”