Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms

By Hüseyin Tanriverdi, N. Venkatraman. 2005

835 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1bbcc7cfe2033a3595f7cd4535733555bb5ca47c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The relationship between international diversification and firm performance: Why it remains a puzzle (2011, methodology): “Farjoun (1994) utilized occupational profiles of industries and Tanriverdi and Venkatraman (2005) relied on managers’ assessments of cross-business knowledge symmetries to measure portfolio relatedness.”
The Corporate Headquarters in the Contemporary Corporation: Advancing a Multimarket Firm Perspective (2015, methodology): “Indeed, research deploying new measures of relatedness based on elements such as knowledge assets (Tanriverdi & Venkatraman, 2005) may contribute to our understanding of the rationale for specific CHQ roles and activities, such as the coordination across businesses.”
Performance Implications of Firm Resource Interactions in the Acquisition of R&D-Intensive Firms (2008, background): “Most extant research on resource interconnectedness (Dierickx and Cool 1989) has focused on positive reinforcement (Milgrom and Roberts 1995, Tanriverdi and Venkatraman 2005, Teece 1986) or on complements, where the marginal benefit from higher levels of one resource increases from the level of…”
Complementary technologies, knowledge relatedness, and invention outcomes in high technology mergers and acquisitions (2009, background): “While synergies can arise from knowledge relatedness at multiple points of the value chain (Tanriverdi and Venkatraman, 2005), because invention is critical for the success of high-technology firms, it is important to assess knowledge relatedness within R&D.”
A multilevel framework of firm boundaries: Firm characteristics, dyadic differences, and network attributes (2010, background): “When a high-status firm's knowledge specialization is high, its sphere of power may be reduced significantly as it may lack sufficient knowledge expertise for it to leverage in dealing with potential partners outside of its own knowledge domain (Tanriverdi and Venkatranman, 2005).”
Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity (2005, neutral): “In a similar vein, the diversification literature argues that most is to be learned from alliance partners with related knowledge and skills (Tanriverdi Venkatraman, 2005), or from areas that firms already possess capabilities in (Penner-Hahn Shaver, 2005).”
Do Effectuation Processes Shape the Relationship between Product Diversification and Performance in New Ventures? (2017, background): “…diversification depends on economies of scope resulting from the replication and transfer of valuable, rare, inimitable, and nonsubstitutable resources (Tanriverdi & Venkatraman, 2005), such as technological, marketing, and production knowledge, and several types of organizational competencies.”
Does the Diversification–Firm Performance Relationship Change Over Time? A Meta‐Analytical Review (2018, methodology): “For five studies which did not report the time period of their observations (Hoskisson et al., 2004; Mackey and Barney, 2013; Narasimhan and Kim, 2002; Oyewobi et al., 2013; Tanriverdi and Venkatraman, 2005), we used the year three years prior to the publication date.”