Establishing a new intellectual property rights regime in the United States: Origins, content and problems

191 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does Biotech Reflect a New Science-based Innovation Regime? (2003, methodology): “Firms whose main activity is to design new computer programs could thus emerge and develop (more on this in Coriat and Orsi 2002).”
Networks, Propinquity, and Innovation in Knowledge-intensive Industries (2009, background): “Second, greater concentrations of scientists are likely to be accompanied by social connections that bridge researchers who share membership in “invisible colleges” or “communities of practice” (Crane, 1978; Brown and Duguid, 1991).”
Patent Systems for Encouraging Innovation: Lessons from Economic Analysis (2006, unknown): “2 See e.g. Kortum and Lerner (1999), Jaffe (2000), Coriat and Orsi (2002), Gallini (2002), Martinez and Guellec (2004).”
Shareholder returns and the exploration–exploitation dilemma: R&D announcements by biotechnology firms (2007, background): “All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.012 not available earlier (Coriat and Orsi, 2002; McNamara et al., 2000).”
From the gene to the globe: Extracting rents based on intellectual property monopolies (2007, background): “…universities were increasingly assigned the task of helping to re-establish the US economy’s international competitive position, as well as its technological leadership in certain areas (Argyres and Liebeskind, 1998: 435f; Coriat, 2002: 182; Coriat and Orsi, 2002; Nelson, 2004: 462; Orsi, 2002).”