Family firms and internationalization‐governance relationships: Evidence of secondary agency issues

By C. Singla, Rajaram Veliyath, Rejie George. 2014

203 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b97ac789ccc1b5d575fe0104a738feb34154526

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. P. Duran
2. Marc van Essen
3. J. Arrégle
4. Michael A. Hitt
5. Alfredo De Massis
6. M. Carney
7. Mike W. Peng
8. Thomas M. Zellweger

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Marc van Essen
2. P. Duran
3. J. Arrégle
4. Michael A. Hitt
5. Alfredo De Massis
6. Thomas M. Zellweger
7. K. Eddleston
8. M. Carney

Citations in the corpus

• Riding the waves of family firm internationalization: A systematic literature review, integrative framework, and research agenda (2020, unknown): “The beginning of this third wave was marked by the study of Singla et al. (2014) who not only considered additional dimensions of internationalization, including FDI, but also measured the relationship between internationalization and governance mechanisms by distinguishing between family managed…”
• Why is Family Firms’ Internationalization Unique? A Meta–Analysis (2017, background): “Finally, principal–principal agency problems between family blockholders and nonfamily shareholders are more likely to exist in FCFs, as family managers can decide to use firm resources for the benefit of their family (e.g., Singla et al., 2014) instead of investing in international expansion.”