Selection of candidate coding DNA barcoding regions for use on land plants

By C. Ford, K. Ayres, N. Toomey, N. Haider, Jonathan VAN ALPHEN STAHL, L. J. Kelly, N. Wikström, P. Hollingsworth, R. Duff, S. B. Hoot and 3 more. 2009

312 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Development of species-specific environmental DNA (eDNA) markers for invasive aquatic plants (2015, background): “For animals, the mitochondrial COI gene has proved broadly satisfactory for identifying species through DNA barcoding (Hebert et al., 2003), whereas identifying suitable barcoding markers in plants have been much more challenging (Chase et al., 2007; Ford et al., 2009).”
DNA Barcoding to Detect Chilli Adulteration in Traded Black Pepper Powder (2014, unknown): “…GAG ACT AAA GC3’ 5’ GTA AAA TCA AGT CCA CCG CG 3’ Kress and Erickson, 2007 rpoC1–2 rpoC1–4 5’ GGC AAA GAG GGA AGA TTT CG3’ 5’ CCA TAA GCA TAT CTT GAG TTG G 3’ Ford et al., 2009 trnH-2 psbA-F 5’ CGC GCA TGG TGG ATT CAC AAT CC 3’ 5’ GTT ATG CAT GAA CGT AAT GCT C 3’ Tate and Simpson, 2003; Yang et…”
Evaluation of 10 plant barcodes in Bryophyta (Mosses) (2010, background): “Several different loci, and combinations thereof, have been suggested as suitable barcodes for land plants (e.g. Pennisi, 2007; Ford et al., 2009).”