Regions and levels: Measuring and mapping users' relevance judgments

By Amanda Spink, Howard Greisdorf. 2001

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Notion of Relevance in Information Science: Everybody knows what relevance is. But, what is it really? (2016, background): “Ø Spink and Greisdorf (2001) used 21 graduate students who, in 43 searches related to their academic information need, retrieved 1,059 documents.”
Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web (2002, background): “However, a substantial number of empirical studies (e.g., Barry, 1994; Cool, Belkin, Frieder, & Kantor, 1993; Park, 1993; Schamber , 1991; Spink & Greisdorf, 2001; Wang & Soergel, 1999) have revealed that people use much more diverse criteria than mere topicality to make relevance judgments in the…”