Problematic Students: Gatekeeping Practices of Academic Professional Psychology Programs.

By T. Vacha-haase, Donna S. Davenport, Shoshana D. Kerewsky. 2004

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b3c323e167ecd03a42c1d464a6c9d07dc972ceb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Nancy J Rubin
2. Psychology Nadine
3. J. Kaslow

Citations in the corpus

• Guiding principles and recommendations for the assessment of competence. (2007, background): “More attention is required with regard to the gate-keeping function that trainers serve when students are assessed as having competence problems that cannot be effectively remediated (Vacha-Haase et al., 2004).”
• Epistemic Exclusion of Women Faculty and Faculty of Color: Understanding Scholar(ly) Devaluation as a Predictor of Turnover Intentions (2021, unknown): “Within disciplines, faculty act as gatekeepers by determining who enters the field, socializing trainees into disciplinary norms, and removing those who fail to meet these standards (e.g., Vacha-Haase et al., 2004).”