Financial Advisors: A Case of Babysitters?

By Andreas Hackethal, Michael Haliassos, Tullio Jappelli. Social Science Research Network, 2012

428 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We use two data sets, one from a large brokerage and another from a major bank, to ask: (i) whether financial advisors are more likely to be matched with poorer, uninformed investors or with richer and experienced investors; (ii) how advised accounts actually perform relative to self-managed accounts; (iii) whether the contribution of independent and bank advisors is similar. We find that advised accounts offer on average lower net returns and inferior risk-return tradeoffs (Sharpe ratios). Trading costs contribute to outcomes, as advised accounts feature higher turnover, consistent with commissions being the main source of advisor income. Results are robust to controlling for investor and local area characteristics. The results apply with stronger force to bank advisors than to independent financial advisors, consistent with greater limitations on bank advisory services.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b28c9bd4eeb0579a07bf2df2a44f4f70247e0a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

  1. M. Kramer
  2. Oscar Stolper
  3. A. Walter
  4. Anna Lusardi
  5. Rob J M Alessie
  6. Tabea Bucher-Koenen
  7. M.C.J. van Rooij
  8. John G. Lynch

In Finance

  1. M. Kramer
  2. M.C.J. van Rooij
  3. Rob J M Alessie
  4. Oscar Stolper
  5. A. Walter
  6. John G. Lynch
  7. Tabea Bucher-Koenen
  8. Anna Lusardi

Citations in the corpus