An Analysis of the Factor Structure of Jones’ Moral Intensity Construct
By Joan M. McMahon, R. Harvey. 2006
157 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b1f9679aa8890ddec25df073d57c1a9b6007377
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
In Information Systems and Management
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- The Role of Individual Variables, Organizational Variables and Moral Intensity Dimensions in Libyan Management Accountants’ Ethical Decision Making (2016, unknown): “As in the case of much previous research (Leitsch 2006; May and Pauli 2002; McMahon and Harvey 2006; O’Leary and Stewart 2007; Sweeney and Costello 2009; Valentine and Hollingworth 2012; Valentine et al. 2013; Yang and Wu 2009), single-item scales were used to measure the three stages of ethical…”
- Effects of the Use of the Availability Heuristic on Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations (2009, background): “The goal of these efforts is to discover what causes ethical decision-making in business (McMahon and Harvey, 2006).”
- A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011 (2013, background): “McMahon and Harvey 2006 JBE Actions taken in scenarios in which moral intensity had been manipulated to be high were judged as more unethical than actions taken in scenarios in which moral intensity was manipulated to be low.”