The impact of population pressure on global carbon dioxide emissions, 1975-1996: evidence from pooled cross-country data
By A. Shi. 2003
673 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b1262c40053712934e2e9de5cc24b808c1fae06
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- Brantley Liddle
- Yan-sui Liu
- Yang Zhou
- Avik Sinha
- Ruhul Salim
- Sahar Shafiei
- Zhaohua Wang
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Muhammad Shahbaz
- Brantley Liddle
- Ruhul Salim
- Yan-sui Liu
- Sahar Shafiei
- Yang Zhou
- Avik Sinha
- Perry Sadorsky
Citations in the corpus
- Modelling the nonlinear relationship between CO2 emissions from oil and economic growth (2012, background): “Cropper and Griffiths (1994), Bruvoll and Medin (2003), Shi (2003), and Lantz and Feng (2006) each include the population variable in the regression and obtain a significantly monotonic relationship between the population and various forms of environmental variables.”
- The effect of new-type urbanization on energy consumption in China: a spatial econometric analysis (2017, methodology): “The IPAT function was first designed by Ehrlich et al. (1971), and it is now widely accepted as a basic framework of modeling research in environmental issues (Harrison, 1981; Raskin, 1995; York et al., 2002; Shi, 2003; Cole and Neumayer et al., 2004; Rosa et al., 2004; Hao and Liu, 2015).”
- Population aging and carbon emissions in OECD countries: Accounting for life-cycle and cohort effects (2012, background): “York et al. (2003), Shi (2003), Cole and Neumayer (2004) and Farzin and Bond (2006) combined data from developed and developing countries.”
- Key Challenges to Ecological Modernization Theory (2003, background): “…of a diversity of environmental impacts that the most highly modernized nations (as indicated by per capita GDP, urbanization, and economic structure) have the highest environmental impacts (Rosa & York, 2002; Rosa et al., 2001; York et al., 2003, in press, unpublished, 2003—see also Shi, 2003).”
- Transitions in pathways of human development and carbon emissions (2013, background): “…of 1 with total emissions, a standard result of cross-sectional studies (Dietz and Rosa 1997, York et al 2003b, Steinberger et al 2010), but one which may not hold for time-series analysis, where elasticities higher or lower than 1 have been observed (Shi 2003, Wei 2011, Jorgenson and Clark 2013).”
- Assessing the impact of population, income and technology on energy consumption and industrial pollutant emissions in China (2015, background): “The IPAT model is limited because it analyzes a problem by changing a factor while keeping others constant, resulting in proportionate impacts on the dependent variable [20,51].”
- The Ecological Footprint Intensity of National Economies (2004, background): “Other impacts with more global consequences (e.g., greenhouse gas emissions), however, generally increase monotonically with economic development (Cavlovic et al. 2000; Chertow 2001; Shi 2003; York et al. 2003a, 2003b, 2003c; Rosa et al. 2004).”
- What are the carbon emissions elasticities for income and population? Bridging STIRPAT and EKC via robust heterogeneous panel estimates (2015, background): “By contrast Shi (2003) estimated a particularly high elasticity for population—between 1.4 and 1.6 for all countries samples; when Shi separated countries by income groups, the elasticity for high income countries was 0.8, whereas the elasticity for middle and low income countries ranged from 1.4…”
- An empirical research on the influencing factors of regional CO2 emissions: Evidence from Beijing city, China (2012, background): “Phetkeo and Shinji also found the same results [16].”