Methods of in vitro toxicology.

By G. Eisenbrand, B. Pool-Zobel, V. Baker, M. Balls, B. Blaauboer, A. Boobis, Angelo Carere, S. Kevekordes, J. Lhuguenot, Raymond Pieters and 1 more. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2002

446 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cancer Research, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1ac6616061cc7ca1244f1715526675711030e0d2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. A. Schrand
2. O. Shenderova
3. S. Hens
4. R. Kroes
5. J. Kleiner
6. J. Teeguarden
7. P. Hinderliter
8. P. Verger

Citations in the corpus

• Nanodiamond Particles: Properties and Perspectives for Bioapplications (2009, background): “241 , 242 In vitro studies rapidly and inexpensively provide an initial risk assessment in cell models that representative likely routes of nanomaterial exposure such as alveolar macrophages (respiratory inhalation), keratinocytes and fibroblasts (integument breech), neuroblastoma or PC”
• Assessment of intake from the diet. (2002, background): “Pure biomarkers of exposure contain no variability due to inter-subject differences in absorption, metabolism or excretion (see also Edler et al., 2002; Eisenbrand et al., 2002).”
• Particokinetics in vitro: dosimetry considerations for in vitro nanoparticle toxicity assessments. (2007, methodology): “This paradigm has been widely and successfully used to assess the relative potency of drug candidates and the relative toxicity of industrial and environmental chemicals (Allen et al., 2005; Bakand et al., 2005; Eisenbrand et al., 2002; Padron et al., 2000).”