as a Robot Controller Neuromodulation as a Robot Controller A Brain-Inspired Strategy for Controlling Autonomous Robots
By Brian R. Cox, J. Krichmar. 2009
27 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Andrea Soltoggio
- Kenneth O. Stanley
- René Felix Reinhart
- Andre Lemme
- Jochen J. Steil
- Sebastian Risi
- Jean-Baptiste Mouret
- Jeff Clune
Citations in the corpus
- Short-term plasticity as cause–effect hypothesis testing in distal reward learning (2014, background): “The utility of modulatory dynamics in models of reward learning and behavior is also validated by closed-loop robotic neural controllers (Ziemke and Thieme, 2002; Sporns and Alexander, 2002; Alexander and Sporns, 2002; Sporns and Alexander, 2003; Soltoggio et al, 2008; Cox and Krichmar, 2009).”
- From modulated Hebbian plasticity to simple behavior learning through noise and weight saturation (2012, background): “, 2010), making neuromodulation particularly suitable for modeling and implementing learning processes (Sporns and Alexander, 2002; Doya, 2002; Doya and Uchibe, 2005; Soula et al., 2005; Farries and Fairhall, 2007; Krichmar, 2008; Cox and Krichmar, 2009).”
- Rare Neural Correlations Implement Robotic Conditioning with Delayed Rewards and Disturbances (2013, background): “The utility of synaptic tags in the solution of the distal ; Doya, 1999, 2002) and neural robotic controllers (Krich-mar, 2008; Cox and Krichmar, 2009), in particular with focus on the role of neuromodulation in attention (Avery et al., 2012).”