THE IMPACT OF PROGRESA ON WOMEN'S STATUS AND INTRAHOUSEHOLD RELATIONS

By M. Adato, B. Brière, D. Mindek. 2000

199 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a785e4625fd4c6fe08c2ef7c30d1a07eaa7fcad

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Spousal Control and Intra-household Decision Making: An Experimental Study in the Philippines (2009, background): “247 [0,1] Husband Gambles but Wife Does Not Know 273 0.”
The impact of conditional cash transfer programmes on child nutrition: a review of evidence using a programme theory framework (2009, methodology): “In both urban and rural areas, problems of sharing of the fortified food with other family members, inadequate preparation, and overall low intake by targeted children were reported (Adato et al. 2000b, Rivera et al. 2004, Neufeld et al. 2006).”
PROGRESA and Its Impacts on the Welfare of Rural Households in Mexico (2005, methodology): “Thus, this section of the evaluation takes a two-pronged approach using quantitative and qualitative surveys to ascertain the position of women within the household (Adato et al. 2000b).”
From Structural Adjustment to Social Adjustment (2008, background): “The study by Adato et al. (2000) found a decline in husbands alone making decisions in a number of areas; medical treatment for children, school attendance and the purchase of children’s clothing, with some effect on food expenditure decisions and those around house repairs.”
Comparing Food and Cash Transfers to the Ultra Poor in Bangladesh (2010, background): “Experience from other programs, such as Mexico’s PROGRESA, shows that consulting the community and keeping husbands informed of the program’s activities and objectives help overcome resistance to the intervention (Adato et al. 2003).”
Measuring and Changing Control: Women's Empowerment and Targeted Transfers (2016, methodology): “Adato et al. (2000), for instance, write: ‘Women’s status is difficult to quantify in the context of large household surveys like the ENCASEH and ENCELs.”
Government Transfers and Political Support (2009, unknown): “24 An alternative explanation for the 2007 effects is that households were unaware of the program’s temporary nature and anticipated permanent income transfers.”
The Importance of Women's Status for Child Nutrition in Developing Countries (2003, unknown): “Outside the household a change in power relations can set off a backlash from men, resulting in increased physical or psychological abuse of women, which is also detrimental to the quality of care for children (Riley 1997; Adato et al. 2000; Hobcraft 2000; Isvan 1991; Sen and Batliwala 2000).”
Examining Conditional Cash Transfer Programs : A Role for Increased Social Inclusion? (2006, background): “…to avoid manipulations by households and local officials, they result obscure and difficult to understand for individual families and have caused tensions within communities where households are divided into beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries (Adato, 2000 and Adato et al, 2000a) (see also III.”
A Mixed-Method Review of Cash Transfers and Intimate Partner Violence in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (2018, background): “They participate a lot because they have this responsibility, in order for the support [transfer] to come,” (Adato et al. 2000).”
Women's Power, Conditional Cash Transfers, and Schooling in Nicaragua (2008, background): “intra-household framework, Adato et al. (2003) and Attanasio and Lechene (2002).”