How Do Political Changes Influence Us Bilateral Aid Allocations? Evidence from Panel Data

By R. Fleck, Christopher Kilby. 2006

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a4aac7554b41bf4dd103b13995bcdbb9e97a30c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

In Information Systems

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Funding Financial Inclusion: Institutional Logics and the Contextual Contingency of Funding for Microfinance Organizations (2016, unknown): “In addition, our study has implications for research on foreign aid, which, for the most part, has focused on understanding aggregate funding flows between countries (e.g., Fleck & Kilby, 2006).”
World Bank Independence: A Model and Statistical Analysis of US Influence (2006, unknown): “Changes in US administrations also shift US foreign aid policies and allocation patterns (Fleck and Kilby, 2006; Poe, 1991).”
Migration and Foreign Aid (2015, background): “These studies have examined the effect of domestic considerations on the size of the overall donor aid budget, rather than the destination of aid (although Fleck and Kilby 2006 is an exception). their national family and who therefore should not be allowed to retain their original nationality.””
Foreign aid: An instrument for fighting communism? (2007, background): “Aid tend to also serve broader foreign policy purposes, such as commercial and strategic interests (see McKinley and Little, 1977 ; Rao, 1997 ; Alesina and Dollar, 2000 ; Fleck and Kilby, 2005 ).”
Development Aid and Economic Growth: A Positive Long-Run Relation (2009, unknown): “(Fleck & Kilby, 2006a, p. 220).”
The roles of foreign aid and education in the war on terror (2008, background): “Fleck and Kilby (2006a) show that the latter play also an important part in determining the allocation of U.S.”
The choice for multilateralism: Foreign aid and American foreign policy (2012, unknown): “Conservatives thus have aid preferences closer to those of Republican presidents and further from those of most multilateral aid organizations (Fleck and Kilby 2006b; Milner and Tingley 2010).”
THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF U.S. FOREIGN AID: AMERICAN LEGISLATORS AND THE DOMESTIC POLITICS OF AID (2009, background): “Foreign aid is politicized and others have shown that domestic interests within donor countries affect aid policy (e.g. Alesina and Dollar, 2000; Dudley and Montmarquette, 1976; Fleck and Kilby, 2006; Irwin, 2000; Therien and Noel, 2000).”
Keeping a Low Profile: What Determines the Allocation of Aid by Non-Governmental Organizations? (2008, unknown): “These variables are standard in the allocation literature on ODA (e.g., Alesina and Dollar, 2000; Fleck and Kilby 2006; Kilby 2006; Nunnenkamp and Thiele 2006).”
Do Donors Target Aid in Line with the Millennium Development Goals? A Sector Perspective of Aid Allocation (2007, background): “However, various other studies suggest that multilateral institutions are not invulnerable to donor pressure (Weck-Hannemann and Schneider 1981; Frey and Schneider 1986; Dreher 2004; Fleck and Kilby 2006; Kilby 2006; Dreher, Sturm and Vreeland 2006; Dreher and Jensen 2007).”
Changing aid regimes? U.S. foreign aid from the Cold War to the War on Terror (2010, methodology): “…and Tichit 2004 [random effects], Dollar and Levin 2006); estimate a Heckman selection model (e.g., Berthélemy 2006, Drury et al. 2005, Meernik et al. 1998); or estimate a two part model (e.g., Berthélemy 2006, Berthélemy and Tichit 2002, Fleck and Kilby 2006A, Kilby 2006, Neumayer 2003).”