Carbon input by plants into the soil. Review.

By Y. Kuzyakov, G. Domański. 2000

1,153 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Soil Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a43906b947a913ca162bc3c78eee851e3ed970c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Environmental Chemistry

In Soil Science

Citations in the corpus

Are root exudates more important than other sources of rhizodeposits in structuring rhizosphere bacterial communities? (2010, background): “Another likely source of carbon substrates and other nutrients is SOM.”
Elevated atmospheric CO2 increases microbial growth rates in soil: results of three CO2 enrichment experiments (2010, background): “However, this effect is frequently counterbalanced by a decreased percentage of C allocated belowground at higher N availability (Kuzyakov & Domanski, 2000; Kuzyakov et al., 2001; Henry et al., 2005).”
Stability and dynamics of enzyme activity patterns in the rice rhizosphere: Effects of plant growth and temperature (2017, background): “Rhizodeposits play a crucial role for rhizosphere processes: stimulates microbial activity (Hinsinger et al., 2009; Kuzyakov and Domanski, 2000) and the production of enzymes (Asmar et al., 1994) and, thus, nutrient availability and soil organic matter (SOM) decomposition (Cheng and Coleman, 1990).”
Differences in rhizosphere carbon-partitioning among plant species of different families (2003, background): “This range of proportions is above the highest values found in the literature for vegetative grasses, with which most investigations have been conducted (see review by (Kuzyakov and Domanski, 2000).”
REVIEW: Time lag between photosynthesis and carbon dioxide efflux from soil: a review of mechanisms and controls (2010, methodology): “The labeling approach used since 1973 (Warembourg & Paul, 1973) was reviewed in detail earlier (Whipps, 1990; Kuzyakov & Domanski, 2000; Kuzyakov et al., 2001).”
Photoassimilate allocation and dynamics of hotspots in roots visualized by 14C phosphor imaging (2011, neutral): “The advantages and disadvantages of these labeling approaches were reviewed in several publications (Whipps, 1990; Kuzyakov and Domanski, 2000; Nguyen, 2003; Kuzyakov and Schneckenberger, 2004; Werth and Kuzyakov, 2008).”
Allocation and residence time of photosynthetic products in a boreal forest using a low‐level 14C pulse‐chase labeling technique (2007, background): “This dual isotope label can be followed over long timescales because it is continuously administered (e.g. into roots, Matamala et al., 2003; soil CO2, S e et al., 2004; allocation by trees, Körner et al., 2005).”
Distribution and turnover of recently fixed photosynthate in ryegrass rhizospheres (2004, background): “Kuzyakov and Domanski (2000) put together an excellent review on above- and below-ground C distribution in pulse-chase labeling experiments.”
New approach for capturing soluble root exudates in forest soils (2008, neutral): “Moreover, a 24 h incubation period has the added advantage in that it spans the diurnal cycle, and thus provides a timeintegrated estimate that accounts for differences in exudation rates which occur between night-time and the peak hours of the day (Kuzyakov & Domanski 2000; Uselman et al. 2000).”
Linking 3D Soil Structure and Plant-Microbe-Soil Carbon Transfer in the Rhizosphere (2018, methodology): “Around 30% of the photosynthetically fixed C is transferred below ground, but this proportion can vary widely depending on environmental conditions, plant species, and the plant growing stage (Kuzyakov and Domanski, 2000).”
Plant and mycorrhizal regulation of rhizodeposition. (2004, neutral): “1; Kuzyakov & Domanski, 2000; Tinker & Nye, 2000).”
Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface (2009, background): “2 t C ha for the vegetation period (Kuzyakov and Domanski 2000).”
A global relationship between the heterotrophic and autotrophic components of soil respiration? (2004, background): “Root and microbial respiration may respond differently to temperature (Boone et al., 1998; Pregitzer et al., 2000; Epron et al., 2001), implying different flux behaviours at a variety of time scales and in different plant species (Kuzyakov & Domanski, 2000).”