Selecting Capabilities for Quality of Life Measurement

By I. Robeyns. 2005

324 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a194453342bc2fcbce8ed7fd6b71be6bc97103c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Multidimensional poverty and inequality (2014, unknown): “See, among others, Sen (1985, 1992), Alkire (2002, 2007), Nussbaum (1990, 1993, 2003), Kuklys (2005), Robeyns (2005, 2006) and Basu and López-Calva (2011).”
Disability and poverty : a survey of World Bank poverty assessments and implications (2009, background): “Rather, he says that in each situation democratic processes and social choice procedures should dictate the functionings used to build and evaluate policies (Clark, 2005; Robeyns, 2005).”
A Multidimensional Approach: Poverty Measurement & Beyond (2013, unknown): “A number of methods are typically followed for this purpose (see Alkire 2008; Robeyns 2005).”
Choosing dimensions: the capability approach and multidimensional poverty. CPRC Working Paper No. 88. (2007, unknown): “22 Stewart 2005 See also Robeyns 2005.”
The Development of Capability Indicators (2009, background): “…many studies related to this approach, it is still widely felt that secondary, quantitative data sources provide little evidence about capabilities, per se, Brandolini and D’Alessio (1998) and Kuklys and Robeyns (2005).9 The next step, therefore, is to develop indicators of the capability set Q.”
Wellbeing, Freedom and Social Justice: The Capability Approach Re-Examined (2017, background): “The capability approach is generally conceived as a flexible and multipurpose framework, rather than a precise theory (Sen 1992a, 48; Alkire 2005; Robeyns 2005b, 2016b; Qizilbash 2012; Hick and Burchardt 2016, 78).”
Bentham or Aristotle in the Development Process? An Empirical Investigation of Capabilities and Subjective Well-Being (2015, methodology): “3 Currently, no procedural method exists for selecting capability metrics (Robeyns, 2005), and scholars use different approximations.”
Socio‐economic impact classification of alien taxa (SEICAT) (2018, background): “However, what is ultimately important for human well-being is how much the realised activities of people have changed (Robeyns 2005a).”
Disability, capability, and special education: towards a capability‐based theory (2009, background): “By presenting a typology of capability analysis based on different epistemological assumptions regarding the role functionings and capabilities, Ingrid Robeyns has shown that the main difference between Sen and Nussbaum is their engagement in different kinds of theoretical projects (Robeyns 2005).”