The structure of perceived qualities of situations

By J. Edwards, A. Templeton. 2005

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1a08eafa5532550bf64216307670f6e24efa45ab

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. C. Nave
2. J. Rauthmann
3. R. Sherman
4. D. Funder

In Social Psychology

1. J. Rauthmann
2. D. Funder
3. R. Sherman
4. C. Nave
5. Jaime K. Hardy
6. S. Segerstrom
7. G. Kolar
8. M. Back

In Sociology and Political Science

1. R. Sherman
2. J. Rauthmann
3. D. Funder
4. C. Nave
5. S. Segerstrom
6. C. Wrzus
7. R. Furr
8. Matthias R. Mehl

Citations in the corpus

• Taking Situations Seriously (2016, background): “Several creative efforts developed various taxonomies of situations over the years (e.g., Edwards & Templeton, 2005; Endler, Hunt, & Rosenstein, 1962; Kelley et  al., 2003; Krahe, 1986; Magnusson, 1971; Van Heck, 1984; Yang, Read, & Miller, 2006; see Ten Berge & De Raad, 1999, for a review and…”
• Principles of Situation Research: Towards a Better Understanding of Psychological Situations (2015, background): “Third, quickly forming impressions of situations serves the adaptive purpose of better navigating through the world (Buss, 2009; Edwards & Templeton, 2005): a perceiver is able to understand—in a succinct manner (e.g. Duty: Work needs to be done)—what is happening, surmise what might have led to…”
• Ultra-Brief Measures for the Situational Eight DIAMONDS Domains (2016, background): “…psychological situation characteristics, Situational Eight DIAMONDS, Riverside Situational Q-Sort (RSQ) Ultra-Brief Measures for the Situational Eight DIAMONDS Domains People perceive and describe situations on psychological situation characteristics (Edwards & Templeton, 2005; Rauthmann, 2012).”
• Intra-individual variability and psychological flexibility: Affect and health in a National US sample (2017, background): “Additionally, features of situations may be more salient than broader categorizations of situations (de Raad, 2004; Edwards & Templeton, 2005; Rauthmann et al., 2014).”
• Personality-driven situation experience, contact, and construal: How people’s personality traits predict characteristics of their situations in daily life (2015, background): “Second, many studies preceded recent advances in the study of situations, including the development of methods to assess them in terms of their psychologically relevant characteristics (de Raad, 2004; Edwards & Templeton, 2005; Fleeson, 2007; Rauthmann et al., 2014).”
• Structuring Situational Information (2015, background): “Social Forgas (1976), Fournier, Moskowitz, and Zuroff (2008, 2009), Edwards and Templeton (2005), Kelley et al.”